Ответы в темах
-
Сообщения
-
Altijd handig, zo’n toetsenbord met Russische letters. Zelf doe ik het met babelfish, maar ja, ik ben nog niet zo ver als jij.
Je hoeft je niet te schamen. Ik bestudeer al een kleine 30 jaar allerlei Slavische talen en ben recent begonnen — pure liefhebberij — aan een nader onderzoek naar enkele opvallende Chinese dialecten. Je moet toch wat in je vrijetijd?
Just for fun. Almost an ‘one-move-problem’
Hein, прекрасная работа (bewonderenswaard)!
Жертвы 3-х дамок выполнены идеально. Особенно красивы первая и вторая. Поздравляю (gefeliciteerd)!Thank you, Evgraf! 18 Strikes in a row, is that a record?
Especially for Eddie:Здравствулте! Evgraf, вы! 18 забастовок в рядке, что показатель?
Just for fun. Almost an ‘one-move-problem’
Hein, прекрасная работа (bewonderenswaard)!
Жертвы 3-х дамок выполнены идеально. Особенно красивы первая и вторая. Поздравляю (gefeliciteerd)!Nou verwacht ik wel van je dat je in het Russisch hierop gepast reageert, Hein !
Voorkeur voor een bepaald dialect?
Тема — жертвы двух дамок на одно и тоже поле очень сложная. Багаж накопленных знаний иногда помогает осуществить заданную тему. Захотелось проверить себя — получилось неважно, но зато недолго мучился 😆 .
30(24),2,13,3,13,7,16,49+Very nice, Gluk. Yes, it is a very difficult theme, but a challenging one!
hwilsens wrote:hwilsens wrote:Mr. Wilsens — what was last black move ? 💡 I know — in such kind of positions prove is neccessary.
By the way — good idea 😆
A. Moiseyev
Actually, it is a composition made by Steenslag (Siep Korteling). If you had asked him, he would have given the following explanation:
23-18 (22-27) 49-44 (13×22).Mr. Wilsens — what was last black move ? 💡 I know — in such kind of positions prove is neccessary.
By the way — good idea 😆
A. Moiseyev
Actually, it is a composition made by Steenslag (Siep Korteling). If you had asked him, he would have given the following explanation:
23-18 (22-27) 49-44 (13×22).Mr. Wilsens — what was last black move ? 💡 I know — in such kind of positions prove is neccessary.
By the way — good idea 😆
A. Moiseyev
Actually, it is a composition made bij Steenslag (Siep Korteling). If you had asked him, he would have given the following explanation:
23-18 (22-27) 49-44 (13×22).Hello colleagues,
This afternoon I had a very crazy idea, but most probably this problem is not correct (second solution) and I don’t like the first move. Who is able to create a correct composition based on this idea ( two times 2-11)?
white: 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 27, 31, 38, 42, 43
black: 1, 3, 6, 16, 17, 25, 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 40
Solution: 2, 2-11 (7) 22, 2, 21, 2-11, 23, 7, 3, 14, 48.Furthermore I am looking for the email addresses of E. Zubow and B. Morkus. Can anybody help me? Thank you!
2x 2-13.
7-2, 2-13, 11×2, 16×7, 30-25, 2-13, 48-42, 6-1, 1×3, 3×45, 45×41, 35×24, 25×5 (15-20), 5-32
Great! New? Snap jij al dat gewauwel hieronder?
[/quote]
wink wink, nudge nudge (Monty Python)
if I quote correctlythis computerchecking destroys our masterpieces[/quote]
Yes, it has destroyed a lot of my compositions on my website http://www.wilsens.nl
(da’s nou marketing, Eddie, pure Tilburgse marketing
.Yes, you are right, Eddie. But the first one is better, I think (9×18!). Besides that, the miniature Matoes made in 1985 seems to be not correct. According to Dam 2.2 it is a draw after 12 (39, 50).
A draw ? Horrible. And even you cannot win this position against anyone with your eyes closed ??? (if you follow my little tease ….)[/quote]
Прювет!
Вдогонку интересным позициям Моисеева.
Г.М.Андреев.
,,Шашки в России» 15.09.2005
Решение не привожу,порешайте…
Отмечу,что ч.п. 15 нужна для устранения п.р.Problem appears to be very similar to this miniature (Matoes, 1985):
Yes, you are right, Eddie. But the first one is better, I think (9×18!). Besides that, the miniature Matoes made in 1985 seems to be not correct. According to Dam 2.2 it is a draw after 12 (39, 50).
Прювет!
Вдогонку интересным позициям Моисеева.
Г.М.Андреев.
,,Шашки в России» 15.09.2005
Решение не привожу,порешайте…
Отмечу,что ч.п. 15 нужна для устранения п.р.Problem appears to be very similar to this miniature (Matoes, 1985):
Yes, you are right, Eddie. But the first one is better, I think (9×18!). Besides that, the miniature Matoes made in 1985 seems to be not correct. According to Dam 2.2 it is a draw after 12 (39, 50).
Прювет!
Вдогонку интересным позициям Моисеева.
Г.М.Андреев.
,,Шашки в России» 15.09.2005
Решение не привожу,порешайте…
Отмечу,что ч.п. 15 нужна для устранения п.р.Problem appears to be very similar to this miniature (Matoes, 1985):
Yes, you are right, Eddie. But the first one is better, I think (9×18!). Besides that, the miniature Matoes made in 1985 seems to be not correct. According to Dam 2.2 it is a draw after 12 (39, 50).
